<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>2.2.1 Waves and Coastal simulations</title>
  <link rel="self" href="https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_category?p_l_id=3231581&amp;mbCategoryId=4461322" />
  <subtitle>Questions about wave or coastal simulations</subtitle>
  <id>https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_category?p_l_id=3231581&amp;mbCategoryId=4461322</id>
  <updated>2026-05-15T14:24:54Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-05-15T14:24:54Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Domain Dries Up Due to Overflow</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3231581&amp;messageId=5938967" />
    <author>
      <name>Muhammad Rushdi</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3231581&amp;messageId=5938967</id>
    <updated>2023-06-27T10:00:48Z</updated>
    <published>2023-06-27T10:00:47Z</published>
    <summary type="html">Hi,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I am simulating a non-hydrostatic model with a simple, low-angle-slope bathymetry using 100 z layers and 0.01 mins timestep. I also impose unidirectional 4 cm/s current as boundary condition and uniform-and-constant zero water level boundary on the other end. However, the model dries out (ie. the water elevation becomes equal to the water depth) after 7 mins (a half of smoothing time, 14 mins). The velocity profile shows extremely high value, up to 1000 m/s.&lt;br /&gt;Has somebody encountered this situation before? Any lead is much appreciated.&lt;br /&gt;Please find attached the model set up files and the velocity profiles.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thanks,&lt;br /&gt;​​​​​​​Rushdi</summary>
    <dc:creator>Muhammad Rushdi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-06-27T10:00:47Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Delft3D stack overflow error</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3231581&amp;messageId=5936968" />
    <author>
      <name>Lee Eddington</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3231581&amp;messageId=5936968</id>
    <updated>2023-06-26T18:56:18Z</updated>
    <published>2023-06-26T18:56:18Z</published>
    <summary type="html">Hi,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I&amp;#39;m new to Delft3D and am running the Wave module and getting a stack overflow error:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;​​​​​​​&lt;br /&gt;+SWAN is processing output request    1&lt;br /&gt;        1 file(s) copied.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;C:\D3D\Southern California&amp;gt;rem exit &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;...End of SWAN run&lt;br /&gt;*** ERROR: file &amp;#39;norm_end&amp;#39; expected to signal a correct SWAN calculation&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;forrtl: severe (170): Program Exception - stack overflow&lt;br /&gt;Image              PC                Routine            Line        Source             &lt;br /&gt;swan_4072ABCDE_de  00000001401D7D87  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown&lt;br /&gt;swan_4072ABCDE_de  00000001400D00AE  SWOEXF                   4403  swanout1.for&lt;br /&gt;swan_4072ABCDE_de  00000001400C068C  SWOUTP                    383  swanout1.for&lt;br /&gt;swan_4072ABCDE_de  000000014002CE1A  SWMAIN                    598  swanmain.for&lt;br /&gt;swan_4072ABCDE_de  000000014002B764  MAIN__                    110  swanmain.for&lt;br /&gt;swan_4072ABCDE_de  00000001401D4FBC  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown&lt;br /&gt;swan_4072ABCDE_de  00000001401B2AE5  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown&lt;br /&gt;KERNEL32.DLL       00007FFD0AC47614  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown&lt;br /&gt;ntdll.dll          00007FFD0B7226F1  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I&amp;#39;m running  on:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Windows 10 Enterprise&lt;br /&gt;Delft3D 4.03.01&lt;br /&gt;Delft3D-WAVE Version 3.05.04.7545M, Sep 13 2017, 20:57:19&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It appears the model runs through the wave computations okay, but crashes when it&amp;#39;s trying to do the output:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; use of rescaling in 100.00 % of wet points with maximum in spectral space =  247&lt;br /&gt; accuracy OK in  99.86 % of wet grid points ( 98.00 % required)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; ++ trace subr: HSOBND&lt;br /&gt; ++ trace subr: SWOUTP&lt;br /&gt;+SWAN is processing output request    1&lt;br /&gt; ++ trace subr: SWORDC&lt;br /&gt; ++ trace subr: SWODDC&lt;br /&gt; ++ trace subr: SWOEXC&lt;br /&gt; ++ trace subr: EVALF&lt;br /&gt; ++ trace subr: EVALF&lt;br /&gt; ++ trace subr: SWOBSTO&lt;br /&gt; ++ trace subr: SWOEXD&lt;br /&gt; ++ trace subr: SWIPOL&lt;br /&gt; ++ trace subr: SWIPOL&lt;br /&gt; ++ trace subr: SWOEXA&lt;br /&gt; ++ trace subr: SWOINA&lt;br /&gt; ++ trace subr: ANGDEG&lt;br /&gt; ++ trace subr: SWOINA&lt;br /&gt; ++ trace subr: ANGDEG&lt;br /&gt;        1 file(s) copied.&lt;br /&gt;        1 file(s) copied.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;My domain is pretty large with:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; Gridresolution       : MXC             465 MYC           1126&lt;br /&gt;                      : MCGRD        407901&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I watched the system memory usage as it runs and it&amp;#39;s &amp;lt; 15%.  CPU usage is 100% during the iterations, but it drops down to ~5% when it crashes processing the output request.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I derefined the grid to:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; Gridresolution       : MXC             233 MYC            563&lt;br /&gt;                      : MCGRD        102115&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;and it runs fine.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Any help would be greatly appreciated.</summary>
    <dc:creator>Lee Eddington</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-06-26T18:56:18Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>RE: Bed stress coefficient ERROR</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3231581&amp;messageId=5910775" />
    <author>
      <name>Eleanor Mawson</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3231581&amp;messageId=5910775</id>
    <updated>2023-06-14T12:35:17Z</updated>
    <published>2023-06-14T12:35:17Z</published>
    <summary type="html">I am making a spatially varying roughness file and everytime I generate this in QUCIKIN it produces negative values even though I have specified the values I wanted. Have you had this issue?</summary>
    <dc:creator>Eleanor Mawson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-06-14T12:35:17Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Errfile Terminating error: Input file missing</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3231581&amp;messageId=5900591" />
    <author>
      <name>Shrikant Dora</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3231581&amp;messageId=5900591</id>
    <updated>2023-06-08T13:45:29Z</updated>
    <published>2023-06-08T13:45:29Z</published>
    <summary type="html">The model runs for around half of time steps then shows  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;file &amp;#39;norm_end&amp;#39; expected to signal a correct SWAN calculation &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;​​​​​​​The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process.</summary>
    <dc:creator>Shrikant Dora</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-06-08T13:45:29Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Problem in Sediment Transport with Discharge Input Only in Flow</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3231581&amp;messageId=5860354" />
    <author>
      <name>Bilge Karakutuk</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3231581&amp;messageId=5860354</id>
    <updated>2023-05-17T12:26:21Z</updated>
    <published>2023-05-17T12:20:58Z</published>
    <summary type="html">Dear Delft3D Community,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I am currently working on Delft3D-FLOW, utilizing a 3D model to observe sediment transport under different discharge conditions. While the simulation itself concludes without any errors or warnings, the results are not in line with expectations.  Despite the velocity distribution appearing reasonable across the intake and discharge locations, some suspended sediment transport results in too far areas which are illogical, and cumulative erosion/deposition distribution is not calculated, seeming like an instability problem??&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In FLOW, my model has 10 layers vertically, where the layer thickness decreases from top to bottom (bed layer). I have specified each intake section in 15 grid cells (5 horizontal*3 vertical) and the discharge section in 35 grid cells (5 horizontal*7 vertical). These discharge grids are specified for the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th layers from the top. For each grid of intakes, the flow is determined as -5.55 m3/s with no additional sediment fraction and for each grid of the discharge, the flow is determined as 9.52 m3/s with no additional sediment fraction. Only sand (as a non-cohesive sediment) has been considered through the simulation process, where the simulation duration is 12 hours and the time step is 0.1 min. The only input is the negative (pumping) discharge and the positive discharge where each of the discharge types is defined as “Normal” and the interpolation method is chosen as “Linear”.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The simulation results are expectable in terms of water level and velocity but there is suspended sediment transport in too far areas from the input (discharge) locations where expected transport does not appear near the input area. The cumulative erosion/sedimentation results are also all zero.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Do you have any experience or ideas related to such a problem?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Consequently, I suspect that the issue may stem from the specified discharges; however, I am unable to comprehend why the sediment transport fails to correlate with the observed velocity behavior. Could you provide insights into the possible reasons behind this problem?&lt;br /&gt;​​​​​​​&lt;br /&gt;With best regards,&lt;br /&gt;​​​​​​​</summary>
    <dc:creator>Bilge Karakutuk</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-05-17T12:20:58Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Hydraulic structures in Delft3d</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3231581&amp;messageId=5854663" />
    <author>
      <name>Nichole John Daculan</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3231581&amp;messageId=5854663</id>
    <updated>2023-05-15T05:24:39Z</updated>
    <published>2023-05-15T05:24:39Z</published>
    <summary type="html">Good Day Delft community! &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Our group is currently conducting a design project through delft3d. The objective of the project is to reduce storm surge induced coastal flooding in a specific area using hydraulic structures (Seawall, Breakwater and Dyke).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; We have already done the initial water level simulation in the area and we would like to know if it is possible to insert hydraulic structures using delft3d. We plan on simulating and recording the water levels during a typhoon&amp;#39;s occurrence with and without a hydraulic structure in order to quantify its effectivity. Is this method possible using delft? If yes, is there a specific procedure that we can follow in order to do it? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;​​​​​​​&lt;br /&gt;Thanks in advance!</summary>
    <dc:creator>Nichole John Daculan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-05-15T05:24:39Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>RE: Simple Wave Run Error</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3231581&amp;messageId=5766437" />
    <author>
      <name>Sofia Joy Quillope</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3231581&amp;messageId=5766437</id>
    <updated>2023-03-29T01:50:02Z</updated>
    <published>2023-03-29T01:50:02Z</published>
    <summary type="html">Hi! The model work just fine when I remove the wave diffraction and setup.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thank you very much!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;​​​​​​​</summary>
    <dc:creator>Sofia Joy Quillope</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-03-29T01:50:02Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>RE: Simple Wave Run Error</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3231581&amp;messageId=5757221" />
    <author>
      <name>Munawir Pratama</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3231581&amp;messageId=5757221</id>
    <updated>2023-03-24T12:23:29Z</updated>
    <published>2023-03-24T10:25:19Z</published>
    <summary type="html">Hi Sofia,&lt;br /&gt;I think this warning is quite general.&lt;br /&gt;I have a quick look at the MDW files. I would suggest running the model without wave setup and wave diffraction. Would it be run normally?&lt;br /&gt;Cheers, Nawir</summary>
    <dc:creator>Munawir Pratama</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-03-24T10:25:19Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Simple Wave Run Error</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3231581&amp;messageId=5754952" />
    <author>
      <name>Sofia Joy Quillope</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3231581&amp;messageId=5754952</id>
    <updated>2023-03-24T00:34:10Z</updated>
    <published>2023-03-24T00:34:10Z</published>
    <summary type="html">Hi!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I am having trouble running my .mdw file. I am suspecting the bathymetry hinders it to run normally. Can I ask for help what are the possible reasons to this? The run also generates a message like this:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;​​​​​​​*** ERROR: file &amp;#39;norm_end&amp;#39; expected to signal a correct SWAN calculation&lt;br /&gt; ERROR: *** ERROR: file &amp;#39;norm_end&amp;#39; expected to signal a correct SWAN calculation&lt;br /&gt; Wave exited abnormally&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;forrtl: severe (172): Program Exception - exception code = 0x7363 (29539)&lt;br /&gt;Image              PC                Routine            Line        Source            &lt;br /&gt;KERNELBASE.dll     00007FF9B4E78B9C  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown&lt;br /&gt;VCRUNTIME140.dll   00007FF9B0E166C0  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown&lt;br /&gt;wave.exe           00007FF725813701  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown&lt;br /&gt;wave.exe           00007FF725600EDA  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown&lt;br /&gt;wave.exe           00007FF7256ACB5D  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown&lt;br /&gt;wave.exe           00007FF7255B9552  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown&lt;br /&gt;wave.exe           00007FF725551615  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown&lt;br /&gt;wave.exe           00007FF7257F8552  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown&lt;br /&gt;wave.exe           00007FF7258203D4  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown&lt;br /&gt;KERNEL32.DLL       00007FF9B5AC13D2  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown&lt;br /&gt;ntdll.dll          00007FF9B7B45454  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thank you!</summary>
    <dc:creator>Sofia Joy Quillope</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-03-24T00:34:10Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Calculating vorticity from FM output</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3231581&amp;messageId=5752709" />
    <author>
      <name>Rachel Burns</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3231581&amp;messageId=5752709</id>
    <updated>2023-03-22T21:09:30Z</updated>
    <published>2023-03-22T21:09:30Z</published>
    <summary type="html">Hello,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I was wondering if anyone has been able to calculate vorticity from the map outputs of a delft3D FM model. I can figure it out for a regular grid, however am struggling to do so for a triangular, irregular grid. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thanks</summary>
    <dc:creator>Rachel Burns</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-03-22T21:09:30Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Unable to deactivate refraction in WAVE module</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3231581&amp;messageId=5642809" />
    <author>
      <name>Arne Knies</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3231581&amp;messageId=5642809</id>
    <updated>2023-02-03T15:27:16Z</updated>
    <published>2023-02-03T15:27:16Z</published>
    <summary type="html">Dear Delft3D community,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;in my installation of Delft3D it seems to be impossible to deactivate the refraction process in the WAVE module / SWAN.&lt;br /&gt;Comparing WAVE runs (tried both coupled and standalone) showed that I get exactly the same results regardless of the value (true / false) of the &lt;em&gt;refraction &lt;/em&gt;keyword in the mdw file. The SWAN &lt;em&gt;INPUT&lt;/em&gt; file does contain the correct keyword &lt;em&gt;OFF REFRAC&lt;/em&gt; and no error / warning message is given in SWAN or D3D output.&lt;br /&gt;I observed the same behaviour when trying to disable frequency shift. For wind growth it worked, however.&lt;br /&gt;The same problem occurs on both my local Windows installation (Delft3D-WAVE Version 3.07.00.62434) and the Linux server (Delft3D-WAVE Version 3.07.00.64862) I&amp;#39;m using.&lt;br /&gt;My colleagues (who use the same program version on their computers) encounter the same behaviour when they try to disable refraction in their models.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It seems to me that the problem is not directly related to the WAVE version or the model setup. Nevertheless, I have attached a simple model setup that yields the same simulation results regardless of the &lt;em&gt;refraction &lt;/em&gt;keyword.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Any suggestion would be much appreciated.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Cheers,&lt;br /&gt;Arne</summary>
    <dc:creator>Arne Knies</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-02-03T15:27:16Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Combing Sea Surface Height (SSH) with Tidal forcing</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3231581&amp;messageId=5600099" />
    <author>
      <name>Russell Lee Lee Nasrallah</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3231581&amp;messageId=5600099</id>
    <updated>2023-01-18T00:02:29Z</updated>
    <published>2023-01-18T00:02:29Z</published>
    <summary type="html">I am currently trying to add SSH to an astronomic tidal signal in Delft3D4. &lt;br /&gt;I have a single offshore boundary and within that, I have included the two water level forcing signals. One is driven by Astronomic constituents. The other is a time series gathered from CMEMS. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/documents/portlet_file_entry/3230934/image--tempRandomSuffix--PcVEpcxG.png/ec726132-8ca6-0221-69c4-d24c5ba70adb" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When I run the simulation, however, the results do not seem to be the combination of these two signals. The tidal signal does not seem represented at all (See below). &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/documents/portlet_file_entry/3230934/image--tempRandomSuffix--qurCtTMh.png/165a82fc-146d-c5f1-5382-f95483c211d6" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;My assumption was that the two signals would be added together and the resulting signal would be forced at the boundary. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Any ideas on why this might not be working? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I&amp;#39;ve included the PLI and BC files below. </summary>
    <dc:creator>Russell Lee Lee Nasrallah</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-01-18T00:02:29Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>FLOW ERROR：NEFIS message 6030: On writing variable pointer table, table 0</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3231581&amp;messageId=5539885" />
    <author>
      <name>Zhen Wei</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3231581&amp;messageId=5539885</id>
    <updated>2022-12-28T14:29:08Z</updated>
    <published>2022-12-28T14:29:08Z</published>
    <summary type="html">Hi,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In the FLOW simulation, when I try a short time case, the model is working fine. But when I try small step and long time simulation (large amount of data), the model is always &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;shutting down normally&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; without finishing the run, see figure 1. I checked the log and it shows &amp;#34;ERROR: &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;NEFIS message 6030: On writing variable pointer table, table 0&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&amp;#34;, as in Figure 2. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What is the cause of this? Is it related to the settings of my computer system or the hardware of the machine itself? Or is it due to boundary conditions or mesh quality? My model has a total of 7000 meshes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;With best regards&lt;br /&gt;Zhen Wei</summary>
    <dc:creator>Zhen Wei</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-12-28T14:29:08Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>RE: Bed stress coefficient ERROR</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3231581&amp;messageId=5404554" />
    <author>
      <name>JAMES PAUL RESCO</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3231581&amp;messageId=5404554</id>
    <updated>2022-10-31T01:47:14Z</updated>
    <published>2022-10-31T01:47:14Z</published>
    <summary type="html">UPDATE: I was able to solve the problem by checking the rgh file for zeros or negative values generated after exporting before copy and pasting the values inside the file</summary>
    <dc:creator>JAMES PAUL RESCO</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-10-31T01:47:14Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The xyz file seems not to be plotted in accordance with our grid area</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3231581&amp;messageId=5359954" />
    <author>
      <name>Reannah Beatriz Clarin</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3231581&amp;messageId=5359954</id>
    <updated>2022-10-13T09:25:33Z</updated>
    <published>2022-10-13T09:25:33Z</published>
    <summary type="html">Good Day! We would like to ask a question with regard to dealing with the software Delft3D Flow. I hope you we&amp;#39;re able to help us and make our study more explicit in its scope.  So we have this reference that we got from youtube, and it&amp;#39;s very useful for us though it does not have audio. And currently, we&amp;#39;re okay with simulating not until we encounter this trouble in using the QUICKIN part in the Delft3D. Well, the xyz file seems not to be plotted in accordance with our grid area. As in the reference video, the xyz file plot very accurately in its grid area. May we know what might error we did in having this issue? Kindly go to 12:07, as we&amp;#39;re in that part.  Reference Video Link: &lt;a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZLOmFUC9IbA"&gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZLOmFUC9IbA&lt;/a&gt; Thank you so much for the invaluable help and looking forward to communicating with you for better understanding.</summary>
    <dc:creator>Reannah Beatriz Clarin</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-10-13T09:25:33Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Weird crash after few days of simulation</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3231581&amp;messageId=5345818" />
    <author>
      <name>Simone Sammartino</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3231581&amp;messageId=5345818</id>
    <updated>2022-10-07T09:20:04Z</updated>
    <published>2022-10-07T09:20:04Z</published>
    <summary type="html">Hi all&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I&amp;#39;m trying to implement a simulation of the Strait of Gibraltar (South of Spain), with a domain spanning from the westernmost limit of the Iberian peninsula (San Vicente Cape) to approximately half of the  southern Spain Coast length (Cartagena). It is few hundreds of km, hence a quite big domain.&lt;br /&gt;The grid is curvilinear, with spherical coordinates, and resolution is of order of 1-2 km in the large areas and few hundreds of meters in the very Strait.&lt;br /&gt;I interpolated bathymetry from a variety of sources and then I smoothed it by iteratively computing the slope factor, so to guarantee it is never higher than abs(0.2).&lt;br /&gt;The vertical coordinates are sigma, with 30 uneven layers.&lt;br /&gt;My intention is to improve horizontal and vertical resolution, and run it as a decomposition domain, but first I want to verify that it works adequately with only one domain.&lt;br /&gt;The model is forced with astronomic water level conditions at both open boundaries (the western and the eastern one). Yes, I know that the same boundary condition is not recommended, but the domain should be big enough to not be an issue. For both boundaries I defined two conditions, the southern and the northern extremes, with tidal constants of 8 constituents, interpolated by the TPXO9-atlas model. M2 amplitude is of order 1 m and 2 cm at western and eastern boundary, respectively, while the other constituents (only semidiurnal and diurnal) are somehow smaller.&lt;br /&gt;The initial condition is interpolated from the MedSea Reanalysis Model from Copernicus.&lt;br /&gt;In a first instance I only configured sea level and current, nor salinity neither temperature, just to make the most simple approximation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The run goes very well during the first 6 days, and then suddenly crashes. The more struggling fact is that the problem originates only at the northernmost cell of the western boundary and after 6 days of smooth and expected behavior. At that cell, despite the water level matches very well with the one imposed by the astronomic forcing, the current velocity behaves quite weird. It is not harmonic and, after 6 days it suddenly (with no previous changes of the sea level) starts increasing up to completely unreal values (of order of tens of m/s). Obviously, after few iteration, the CFL condition starts failing, and the model ends crashing.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I tried different configurations of viscosity, roughness and 3D turbulence scheme, but nothing works.&lt;br /&gt;Any idea of what is wrong?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I attach the .bca, and .mdf files and few screenshots of sea level and current of the western boundary. The blue line is the northern cell and the red one is the southern one.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thank you in advance.&lt;br /&gt;Best regards&lt;br /&gt;Simone</summary>
    <dc:creator>Simone Sammartino</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-10-07T09:20:04Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Bed stress coefficient ERROR</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3231581&amp;messageId=5319077" />
    <author>
      <name>JAMES PAUL RESCO</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3231581&amp;messageId=5319077</id>
    <updated>2022-09-23T10:22:40Z</updated>
    <published>2022-09-23T10:22:39Z</published>
    <summary type="html">Hi everyone. I have encountered an error about bed stress. The simulation stopped at part five. It says &amp;#34;ERROR Zero or negative value found for Bed stress coefficient&amp;#34; in the diagnosis file. How can I fix this? This happened after I created a space-varying roughness file. I have attached the diagnosis file, MDF and roughness file for your reference&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sincerely,&lt;br /&gt;James Paul</summary>
    <dc:creator>JAMES PAUL RESCO</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-09-23T10:22:39Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>RE: missing libnetcdf.so.7</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3231581&amp;messageId=5287965" />
    <author>
      <name>Zhiling Liao</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3231581&amp;messageId=5287965</id>
    <updated>2022-09-09T13:48:26Z</updated>
    <published>2022-09-09T13:48:26Z</published>
    <summary type="html">I sorted it out myself, just install the netcdf-c-4.3.3 version and add the lib into LD_LIBRARY_PATH environment.</summary>
    <dc:creator>Zhiling Liao</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-09-09T13:48:26Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>missing libnetcdf.so.7</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3231581&amp;messageId=5287533" />
    <author>
      <name>Zhiling Liao</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3231581&amp;messageId=5287533</id>
    <updated>2022-09-09T11:35:44Z</updated>
    <published>2022-09-09T10:38:47Z</published>
    <summary type="html">hi,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I am using the 65936 version and all examples run normally except the one in dflowfm/e100..._FM_WAVE/, below is the error message. looks like this library is not available in the netcdf-c-4.6.1 I installed, which version of netcdf I should use?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/documents/portlet_file_entry/3230934/image--tempRandomSuffix--f9DMM0QX.png/1f0652a4-addb-229e-a205-440e5aa95d29" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;​​​​​​​</summary>
    <dc:creator>Zhiling Liao</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-09-09T10:38:47Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>RE: Inputting .xyz file for samples not working</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3231581&amp;messageId=5266717" />
    <author>
      <name>Gabriel Ruiz</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3231581&amp;messageId=5266717</id>
    <updated>2022-08-30T05:22:55Z</updated>
    <published>2022-08-30T05:22:55Z</published>
    <summary type="html">Hi Charles!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Can you share your *.xyz file to check it and try to find the source problem?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Regards&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;​​​​​​​Gabriel</summary>
    <dc:creator>Gabriel Ruiz</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-08-30T05:22:55Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>
