<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>Riverlab</title>
  <link rel="self" href="https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_category?p_l_id=3228466&amp;mbCategoryId=0" />
  <subtitle>This website provides the platform for the availability and continuous development of the process-based, hydrodynamic and morphological model environment. It is based on the Delft3D-FM (Flexible mesh) software. Available is the software for 1D, 2D and 3D modelling. Some example-models are available.</subtitle>
  <id>https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_category?p_l_id=3228466&amp;mbCategoryId=0</id>
  <updated>2026-05-12T12:37:25Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-05-12T12:37:25Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>RE: Problem to find equilibrium under variable discharge</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3228466&amp;messageId=5707616" />
    <author>
      <name>Victor Chavarrias</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3228466&amp;messageId=5707616</id>
    <updated>2023-03-09T06:24:20Z</updated>
    <published>2023-03-09T06:24:20Z</published>
    <summary type="html">Hi, &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The space marching method is something for Liselot to answer... I will reach her. The crash occurs because the size of `Mak` does not match with the number of flownodes (`dx`) and the number of effective size fractions (`nef`). There must be something murky there. Maybe you could stop in debug mode and check what are the dimensions of `Mak`. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Regards, &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;​​​​​​​V</summary>
    <dc:creator>Victor Chavarrias</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-03-09T06:24:20Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Issue running  the base bifurcation example provided in the repository</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3228466&amp;messageId=5706629" />
    <author>
      <name>Mohammad Kifayath Chowdhury</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3228466&amp;messageId=5706629</id>
    <updated>2023-03-08T15:37:46Z</updated>
    <published>2023-03-08T15:37:46Z</published>
    <summary type="html">Hi,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I am exploring the bifurcation options in ELV. Unfortunately, the input file for the bifurcation is not working. Can someone help me with the error codes---&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;***&lt;br /&gt;Size inputs must be integers. in check_bra, at line 185 &lt;br /&gt;The parents are: &lt;br /&gt;1)      check_input, at line 109 &lt;br /&gt;2)      ELV, at line 85 &lt;br /&gt;3)      run_ELV, at line 53 &lt;br /&gt;4)      oh_ELV_please_run, at line 157 &lt;br /&gt;5)      main_run_single, at line 37 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;*** &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The input file is the same as in svn. But I have attached it here.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thanks in advance. &lt;br /&gt;Best wishes,&lt;br /&gt;Kifayath&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; </summary>
    <dc:creator>Mohammad Kifayath Chowdhury</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-03-08T15:37:46Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Problem to find equilibrium under variable discharge</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3228466&amp;messageId=5706581" />
    <author>
      <name>Mohammad Kifayath Chowdhury</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3228466&amp;messageId=5706581</id>
    <updated>2023-03-08T15:38:44Z</updated>
    <published>2023-03-08T15:28:05Z</published>
    <summary type="html">Hi,&lt;br /&gt;I have the following question-&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. I have been trying to calculate using the space marching method (initype=52) for unisize sediment single branch problem. For initype 2, the code runs smoothly but with 52 it crashes with the following set of messages-&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;***&lt;br /&gt;Number of elements must not change. Use [] as one of the size inputs to automatically calculate the appropriate size for that dimension. in sediment_transport, at line 145 &lt;br /&gt;The parents are: &lt;br /&gt;1)      march_step_uni, at line 62 &lt;br /&gt;2)      ini_equi, at line 130 &lt;br /&gt;3)      initial_condition_construction, at line 259 &lt;br /&gt;4)      condition_construction, at line 85 &lt;br /&gt;5)      ELV, at line 106 &lt;br /&gt;6)      run_ELV, at line 53 &lt;br /&gt;7)      oh_ELV_please_run, at line 157 &lt;br /&gt;8)      main_run_single, at line 37 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;*** &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I tried to follow the error code, but could not solve it. What is the problem in this case? I have attached the input file. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thanks in advance.&lt;br /&gt;Best wishes,&lt;br /&gt;Kifayath</summary>
    <dc:creator>Mohammad Kifayath Chowdhury</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-03-08T15:28:05Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>RE: Issue using initial conditions for sediment fractions from restart file</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3228466&amp;messageId=5692994" />
    <author>
      <name>Victor Chavarrias</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3228466&amp;messageId=5692994</id>
    <updated>2023-03-01T16:18:37Z</updated>
    <published>2023-03-01T16:18:37Z</published>
    <summary type="html">From Willem:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;[17:13] Willem OttevangerHi Eki, &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I have tested the nourishment with a time series and it appears to work. &lt;br /&gt;Could you let me know if the following files work for you too? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Kind regards,&lt;br /&gt;Willem &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;nourishment.dad&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div class="lfr-code"&gt;&lt;table&gt;&lt;tbody&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="line-numbers"&gt;1&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class="lines"&gt;&lt;div class="line"&gt;[DredgeFileInformation]&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="line-numbers"&gt;2&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class="lines"&gt;&lt;div class="line"&gt;   FileCreatedBy    = Willem Ottevanger&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="line-numbers"&gt;3&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class="lines"&gt;&lt;div class="line"&gt;   FileCreationDate = 01-03-2023&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="line-numbers"&gt;4&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class="lines"&gt;&lt;div class="line"&gt;   FileVersion      = 01.02   &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="line-numbers"&gt;5&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class="lines"&gt;&lt;div class="line"&gt;[General]&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="line-numbers"&gt;6&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class="lines"&gt;&lt;div class="line"&gt;   PolygonFile      = nourishment.pol&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="line-numbers"&gt;7&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class="lines"&gt;&lt;div class="line"&gt;   InPolygon        = 2                            # Indicate how to check whether a grid cell is inside polygon 1: all corners (min. area), 2: centre (default), 3: one of the corners (max. area)&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="line-numbers"&gt;8&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class="lines"&gt;&lt;div class="line"&gt;   TimeSeries       = nourishment.bct&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="line-numbers"&gt;9&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class="lines"&gt;&lt;div class="line"&gt;[Nourishment]&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="line-numbers"&gt;10&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class="lines"&gt;&lt;div class="line"&gt;   Name            = Nourishment&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="line-numbers"&gt;11&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class="lines"&gt;&lt;div class="line"&gt;   MaxVolRate      = 365&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="line-numbers"&gt;12&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class="lines"&gt;&lt;div class="line"&gt;   DistrOverDump   = 1&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="line-numbers"&gt;13&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class="lines"&gt;&lt;div class="line"&gt;   Dump            = Nourishment1&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="line-numbers"&gt;14&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class="lines"&gt;&lt;div class="line"&gt;   Sediment        = Sediment1&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="line-numbers"&gt;15&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class="lines"&gt;&lt;div class="line"&gt;   SedPercentage   = 0.0&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="line-numbers"&gt;16&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class="lines"&gt;&lt;div class="line"&gt;   Sediment        = Sediment2&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="line-numbers"&gt;17&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class="lines"&gt;&lt;div class="line"&gt;   SedPercentage   = 0.0&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="line-numbers"&gt;18&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class="lines"&gt;&lt;div class="line"&gt;   Sediment        = Sediment3&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="line-numbers"&gt;19&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class="lines"&gt;&lt;div class="line"&gt;   SedPercentage   = 100.0&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="line-numbers"&gt;20&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class="lines"&gt;&lt;div class="line"&gt;   Sediment        = Sediment4&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="line-numbers"&gt;21&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class="lines"&gt;&lt;div class="line"&gt;   SedPercentage   = 0.0&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="line-numbers"&gt;22&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class="lines"&gt;&lt;div class="line"&gt;   Sediment        = Sediment5&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="line-numbers"&gt;23&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class="lines"&gt;&lt;div class="line"&gt;   SedPercentage   = 0.0&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="line-numbers"&gt;24&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class="lines"&gt;&lt;div class="line"&gt;   Sediment        = Sediment6&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="line-numbers"&gt;25&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class="lines"&gt;&lt;div class="line"&gt;   SedPercentage   = 0.0&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="line-numbers"&gt;26&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class="lines"&gt;&lt;div class="line"&gt;   Sediment        = Sediment7&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="line-numbers"&gt;27&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class="lines"&gt;&lt;div class="line"&gt;   SedPercentage   = 0.0&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="line-numbers"&gt;28&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class="lines"&gt;&lt;div class="line"&gt;   Sediment        = Sediment8&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="line-numbers"&gt;29&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class="lines"&gt;&lt;div class="line"&gt;   SedPercentage   = 0.0&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="line-numbers"&gt;30&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class="lines"&gt;&lt;div class="line"&gt;   Sediment        = Sediment9&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="line-numbers"&gt;31&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class="lines"&gt;&lt;div class="line"&gt;   SedPercentage   = 0.0&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="line-numbers"&gt;32&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class="lines"&gt;&lt;div class="line"&gt;   Sediment        = Sediment10&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="line-numbers"&gt;33&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class="lines"&gt;&lt;div class="line"&gt;   SedPercentage   = 0.0&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="line-numbers"&gt;34&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class="lines"&gt;&lt;div class="line"&gt;   Sediment        = Sediment11&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="line-numbers"&gt;35&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class="lines"&gt;&lt;div class="line"&gt;   SedPercentage   = 0.0&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="line-numbers"&gt;36&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class="lines"&gt;&lt;div class="line"&gt;   Sediment        = Sediment12&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="line-numbers"&gt;37&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class="lines"&gt;&lt;div class="line"&gt;   SedPercentage   = 0.0&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="line-numbers"&gt;38&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class="lines"&gt;&lt;div class="line"&gt;   Sediment        = Sediment13&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="line-numbers"&gt;39&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class="lines"&gt;&lt;div class="line"&gt;   SedPercentage   = 0.0&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="line-numbers"&gt;40&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class="lines"&gt;&lt;div class="line"&gt;   Sediment        = Sediment14&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="line-numbers"&gt;41&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class="lines"&gt;&lt;div class="line"&gt;   SedPercentage   = 0.0&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="line-numbers"&gt;42&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class="lines"&gt;&lt;div class="line"&gt;   Sediment        = Sediment15&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="line-numbers"&gt;43&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class="lines"&gt;&lt;div class="line"&gt;   SedPercentage   = 0.0&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="line-numbers"&gt;44&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class="lines"&gt;&lt;div class="line"&gt;   Sediment        = Sediment16&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="line-numbers"&gt;45&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class="lines"&gt;&lt;div class="line"&gt;   SedPercentage   = 0.0&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;nourishment.pol&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;div class="lfr-code"&gt;&lt;table&gt;&lt;tbody&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="line-numbers"&gt;1&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class="lines"&gt;&lt;div class="line"&gt;Nourishment1&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="line-numbers"&gt;2&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class="lines"&gt;&lt;div class="line"&gt;     5     2&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="line-numbers"&gt;3&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class="lines"&gt;&lt;div class="line"&gt;      -0.560837    4623.072754&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="line-numbers"&gt;4&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class="lines"&gt;&lt;div class="line"&gt;       1.761494    4623.072754&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="line-numbers"&gt;5&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class="lines"&gt;&lt;div class="line"&gt;       1.700382    4596.793457&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="line-numbers"&gt;6&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class="lines"&gt;&lt;div class="line"&gt;       1.578152    4578.092285&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="line-numbers"&gt;7&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class="lines"&gt;&lt;div class="line"&gt;      -0.194153    4578.214355&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;nourishment.bct&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div class="lfr-code"&gt;&lt;table&gt;&lt;tbody&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="line-numbers"&gt;1&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class="lines"&gt;&lt;div class="line"&gt;location                     &amp;#39;Nourishment&amp;#39;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="line-numbers"&gt;2&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class="lines"&gt;&lt;div class="line"&gt;time-function                &amp;#39;non-equidistant &amp;#39;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="line-numbers"&gt;3&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class="lines"&gt;&lt;div class="line"&gt;reference-time               19940101&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="line-numbers"&gt;4&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class="lines"&gt;&lt;div class="line"&gt;time-unit                    &amp;#39;seconds&amp;#39;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="line-numbers"&gt;5&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class="lines"&gt;&lt;div class="line"&gt;interpolation                &amp;#39;block&amp;#39;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="line-numbers"&gt;6&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class="lines"&gt;&lt;div class="line"&gt;parameter                    &amp;#39;time &amp;#39;         unit &amp;#39; &amp;#39;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="line-numbers"&gt;7&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class="lines"&gt;&lt;div class="line"&gt;parameter                    &amp;#39;active &amp;#39;       unit &amp;#39;-&amp;#39;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="line-numbers"&gt;8&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class="lines"&gt;&lt;div class="line"&gt;    0.0000                    1.0&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="line-numbers"&gt;9&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class="lines"&gt;&lt;div class="line"&gt;    536457600.000             1.0&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="line-numbers"&gt;10&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class="lines"&gt;&lt;div class="line"&gt;    820454400.000             1.0&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
    <dc:creator>Victor Chavarrias</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-03-01T16:18:37Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>RE: Issue using initial conditions for sediment fractions from restart file</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3228466&amp;messageId=5676026" />
    <author>
      <name>Eki Liptiay</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3228466&amp;messageId=5676026</id>
    <updated>2023-02-22T13:51:08Z</updated>
    <published>2023-02-22T13:51:07Z</published>
    <summary type="html">Good afternoon everyone,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I will be following up on Birgits research, which will almost certainly mean that I will be using the same model. Therefore, I was wondering if you had any time to look at the problems Birgit ran in to.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Kind regards,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;​​​​​​​Eki</summary>
    <dc:creator>Eki Liptiay</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-02-22T13:51:07Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>RE: Issue with unisize runs in ELV</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3228466&amp;messageId=5654894" />
    <author>
      <name>Mohammad Kifayath Chowdhury</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3228466&amp;messageId=5654894</id>
    <updated>2023-02-09T11:15:01Z</updated>
    <published>2023-02-09T11:15:01Z</published>
    <summary type="html">In addition, I am using flowtype 1 (steady), and steady solver type 1 (energy euler)</summary>
    <dc:creator>Mohammad Kifayath Chowdhury</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-02-09T11:15:01Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Issue with unisize runs in ELV</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3228466&amp;messageId=5654869" />
    <author>
      <name>Mohammad Kifayath Chowdhury</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3228466&amp;messageId=5654869</id>
    <updated>2023-02-09T11:13:16Z</updated>
    <published>2023-02-09T11:13:16Z</published>
    <summary type="html">Hi! I am trying to run a very simple unisize, constant discharge, single branch model in elv to find the equilibrium solution. The inputs look like the following:&lt;br /&gt; input.sed.dk =[2]./1000; input.ini.Fak = [1]; input.ini.fsk = [1];&lt;br /&gt;input.ini.slopeb = 1*1e-4; input.ini.initype=1;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;input.bcm.type=1; input.bcm.NFLtype=1; input.bcm.NFLparam=[1e-4,0.05];  Qbk0_base = 0.05; input.bcm.Qbk0_tot = 0.05;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;input.bch.uptype=1; input.bch.Q0=2000; input.tra.cr=2 %Engelund Hansen; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;input.mor.gsdupdate=7;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;input.grd.L=100e3; input.grd.dx=2000; input.frc.Cf=0.004; input.mdv.dt=86400&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When I run this (along with the other inputs) input set up to calculate the equilibrium with initype=1, the get_equivals_V gets an error - &amp;#34;Error using optimoptions&lt;br /&gt;Invalid solver specified. Provide a solver name or handle (such as &amp;#39;fmincon&amp;#39; or @fminunc).&lt;br /&gt;Type DOC OPTIMOPTIONS for a list of solvers.&amp;#34;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;if I choose initype=2, then the substrate runs out. I am not sure which parameter I am putting in wrong. Any help would be much appreciated. </summary>
    <dc:creator>Mohammad Kifayath Chowdhury</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-02-09T11:13:16Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>RE: Parameters responsible for "Warning: Bedlevel exceeds 5% waterdepth"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3228466&amp;messageId=5644319" />
    <author>
      <name>Victor Chavarrias</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3228466&amp;messageId=5644319</id>
    <updated>2023-02-04T13:10:27Z</updated>
    <published>2023-02-04T13:10:27Z</published>
    <summary type="html">Beware that the warning does not say that the bed level exceeds 5% of the water depth, but the bed level &lt;strong&gt;change&lt;/strong&gt; exceeds 5% of the water depth. The time step is excessively large or the flow depth is excessively small for morphodynamic update. Depending on the case the message can be ignored or not. For instance, if you are interested in main channel dynamics and the warning occurs in the floodplain during a flood, you may decide that it is better to have a faster simulation with soe innacuracy in the floodplain. </summary>
    <dc:creator>Victor Chavarrias</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-02-04T13:10:27Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Parameters responsible for "Warning: Bedlevel exceeds 5% waterdepth"</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3228466&amp;messageId=5643840" />
    <author>
      <name>Niraj Bal Tamang</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3228466&amp;messageId=5643840</id>
    <updated>2023-02-04T05:52:23Z</updated>
    <published>2023-02-04T05:52:23Z</published>
    <summary type="html">I was wondering which parameters in the  morphodynamic model are responsible for the &amp;#34;Warning: Bedlevel exceeds 5% waterdepth&amp;#34; in morphodynamic model. Is it the sediment feed volume, minimum thickness of computation or other parameters in the .mor and .sed files?</summary>
    <dc:creator>Niraj Bal Tamang</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-02-04T05:52:23Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>RE: Model not taking the sediment data from bcm file</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3228466&amp;messageId=5634779" />
    <author>
      <name>Victor Chavarrias</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3228466&amp;messageId=5634779</id>
    <updated>2023-01-31T08:23:15Z</updated>
    <published>2023-01-31T08:23:15Z</published>
    <summary type="html">Maybe a sudden increase of the upstream sediment load by 10 times its original value is causing a shock wave that would need a very small time step to be resolved. Sediment may be piling up at the upstream end. Rather than decreasing the time step, I would try gradually increasing the load, if that is acceptable for your research.</summary>
    <dc:creator>Victor Chavarrias</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-01-31T08:23:15Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>RE: Model not taking the sediment data from bcm file</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3228466&amp;messageId=5634200" />
    <author>
      <name>Niraj Bal Tamang</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3228466&amp;messageId=5634200</id>
    <updated>2023-01-31T03:33:48Z</updated>
    <published>2023-01-31T03:33:48Z</published>
    <summary type="html">I made the changes as mentioned above. I assigned the IBedCond = 4 at upstream boundary and 1 at downstream boundary. And then I put ICmpCond=0.  I am using 2 fractions of sediment with 0.5m thickness each. I ran the model without sediment feed first. I extracted the maximum sediment transport at each timestep among all cross-section and multiplied this by 10 to feed into the new model. When I check the results, I found that there was no sediment feed into the channel after first timestep. The cumulative transport curve showed a big rise at the start and no sediment change in the transport. I checked the .dia file. It is full of Bed change exceeds 5% of waterdepth after ...timesteps and Erosion Shortage at NM. Does this indicate that there is no feed of sediment from the upstream boundary (which I assigned in the .mor and .bcm files) or the values for the parameters need some changes?</summary>
    <dc:creator>Niraj Bal Tamang</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-01-31T03:33:48Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>RE: Model not taking the sediment data from bcm file</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3228466&amp;messageId=5619035" />
    <author>
      <name>Victor Chavarrias</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3228466&amp;messageId=5619035</id>
    <updated>2023-01-23T09:14:57Z</updated>
    <published>2023-01-23T09:14:57Z</published>
    <summary type="html">You cannot fix the bed at an outflowing boundary (in a river case, the downstream end). The bed level will be updated. Only if flow would reverse, the boundary condition would be applied. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As for the bed-composition boundary condition, if you specify the load per size fraction it has no meaning to fix the upstream composition, you are already providing all necessary BC&amp;#39;s. </summary>
    <dc:creator>Victor Chavarrias</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-01-23T09:14:57Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>RE: Model not taking the sediment data from bcm file</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3228466&amp;messageId=5618776" />
    <author>
      <name>Niraj Bal Tamang</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3228466&amp;messageId=5618776</id>
    <updated>2023-01-23T05:48:46Z</updated>
    <published>2023-01-23T05:48:46Z</published>
    <summary type="html">Thanks a lot. I assigned the IBedCond = 4 at upstream boundary and 1 at downstream boundary. And then I put ICmpCond=0. I can see the sediment feed now in the model. Is it a good idea to fix the bed at the downstream boundary? And how will the model be affected for ICmpCond=0 or 1? I only found a short description in the table of the manual. Would be helpful to be clear on this. Thanks once again. </summary>
    <dc:creator>Niraj Bal Tamang</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-01-23T05:48:46Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>RE: Model not taking the sediment data from bcm file</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3228466&amp;messageId=5618772" />
    <author>
      <name>Victor Chavarrias</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3228466&amp;messageId=5618772</id>
    <updated>2023-01-23T05:31:00Z</updated>
    <published>2023-01-23T05:31:00Z</published>
    <summary type="html">The question is then, where are you observing the cumulative load? You could add a cross-section right downstream of the upstream boundary to check the sediment that enters the model. In any case, by comparing the map results, you should find differences between runs. </summary>
    <dc:creator>Victor Chavarrias</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-01-23T05:31:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>RE: Model not taking the sediment data from bcm file</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3228466&amp;messageId=5616401" />
    <author>
      <name>Niraj Bal Tamang</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3228466&amp;messageId=5616401</id>
    <updated>2023-01-21T20:14:46Z</updated>
    <published>2023-01-21T20:14:46Z</published>
    <summary type="html">I am using ICmpCond=0 and IBedCond=4 for my model. It is running smoothly but again I see no change in the bedload transport. Am I taking wrong reference to see the impact of the sediment feed in the channel? Does the bedload transport remain constant irrespective of the additional sediment for the same discharge? I assume transport remain the same but the bedlevel might vary due to storage for additional sediment. I am a bit confused if it is with the input file or the output interpretation. What could be the best output variable to observe such changes? Thank you  </summary>
    <dc:creator>Niraj Bal Tamang</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-01-21T20:14:46Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>RE: Model not taking the sediment data from bcm file</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3228466&amp;messageId=5611838" />
    <author>
      <name>Victor Chavarrias</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3228466&amp;messageId=5611838</id>
    <updated>2023-01-20T05:00:41Z</updated>
    <published>2023-01-20T05:00:41Z</published>
    <summary type="html">What is the sediment composition in the upstream end of the domain and what boundary condition for the upstream composition are you imposing? If the initial composition is unisize (it seems based on your explanation) and the boundary condition for composition is fixed, you are not allowing the necessary changes in composition for the sediment transport per size fraction to enter. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In short, check that &lt;div class="lfr-code"&gt;&lt;table&gt;&lt;tbody&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="line-numbers"&gt;1&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class="lines"&gt;&lt;div class="line"&gt;ICmpCond=0&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/div&gt; in the mor-file.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Also, check that you are correctly setting the boundary condition of the bed level upstream to sediment load. That is, &lt;div class="lfr-code"&gt;&lt;table&gt;&lt;tbody&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class="line-numbers"&gt;1&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class="lines"&gt;&lt;div class="line"&gt;IBedCond &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/div&gt;must be 4 or 5. </summary>
    <dc:creator>Victor Chavarrias</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-01-20T05:00:41Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Model not taking the sediment data from bcm file</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3228466&amp;messageId=5611136" />
    <author>
      <name>Niraj Bal Tamang</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3228466&amp;messageId=5611136</id>
    <updated>2023-01-19T20:42:22Z</updated>
    <published>2023-01-19T20:42:22Z</published>
    <summary type="html">I ran a morphodynamic model with varying sediment feed. However, the output is showing the same amount of cumulative bedload transport for all model runs. I assume the model is not taking the sediment feed data and just working on the initial bed composition. I generated a bcm file for sediment feed and flagged this within the mor file. I kept all the other conditions same for all model runs except the sediment feed bcm file. I ran another channel section with varying sediment feed. Both the models are working but the sediment feed doesn&amp;#39;t differ for sediment scenarios. Can anyone please suggest what might be causing this? Thanks</summary>
    <dc:creator>Niraj Bal Tamang</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-01-19T20:42:22Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>RE: Open earth tool for cumulative erosion/deposition map in dflowfm</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3228466&amp;messageId=5285325" />
    <author>
      <name>Victor Chavarrias</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3228466&amp;messageId=5285325</id>
    <updated>2022-09-08T09:34:26Z</updated>
    <published>2022-09-08T09:34:26Z</published>
    <summary type="html">When using Quickplot, be aware of the option of recording a script by clicking on the 8th icon starting from the left, the one showing a red circle with an &amp;#34;M&amp;#34;. Then you can see the commands needed to load data and then plot it, so you can adjust it to your needs. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If you want more freedom, I would suggest you to use the EHY tools. For instance, use &amp;lt;EHY_getGridInfo&amp;gt; to get the grid, &amp;lt;EHY_getMapModelData&amp;gt; to load map-file data, and &amp;lt;EHY_plotMapModelData&amp;gt; to plot it.</summary>
    <dc:creator>Victor Chavarrias</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-09-08T09:34:26Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Open earth tool for cumulative erosion/deposition map in dflowfm</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3228466&amp;messageId=5284882" />
    <author>
      <name>Niraj Bal Tamang</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3228466&amp;messageId=5284882</id>
    <updated>2022-09-08T05:54:38Z</updated>
    <published>2022-09-08T05:54:37Z</published>
    <summary type="html">I want to generate a cumulative erosion/deposition map using the codes available in dflowfm under open earth tools. Can anyone please tell me what is the name of the code for this? I tried to generate the map in quickplot but I couldn&amp;#39;t reverse the colorbar in the GUI. Any one of the solutions to the above problems will work for me.&lt;br /&gt;Thank you </summary>
    <dc:creator>Niraj Bal Tamang</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-09-08T05:54:37Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>RE: Spatially varying initial sediment thickness file assignment</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3228466&amp;messageId=5193998" />
    <author>
      <name>Victor Chavarrias</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://dlt-acc.firelay.cloud/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=3228466&amp;messageId=5193998</id>
    <updated>2022-07-21T04:19:58Z</updated>
    <published>2022-07-21T04:19:58Z</published>
    <summary type="html">When using the the initial composition file using flag &amp;lt;inicomp&amp;gt; in the mor-file, the initial sediment thickness file under flag &amp;lt;IniSedThick&amp;gt; in the sed-file is overwritten (i.e., not used). </summary>
    <dc:creator>Victor Chavarrias</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-07-21T04:19:58Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>
